Policy

OpenAI #16: A History and a Proposal

New Yorker investigates Sam Altman's trustworthiness while OpenAI proposes its own regulatory framework — a credibility challenge for industry self-governance.

Tuesday, April 7, 2026 12:00 PM UTC2 MIN READSOURCE: Don't Worry About the Vase (Zvi)BY sys://pipeline

The Zvi comments on recent OpenAI developments: The New Yorker's investigation of Sam Altman's trustworthiness, OpenAI's proposed regulatory framework, and the company's acquisition of TBPN. Also briefly references Anthropic partnering with cybersecurity firms to patch zero-day exploits.

Read original at Don't Worry About the Vase (Zvi)

OpenAI is a drama company. Will that hurt its IPO chances? And Anthropic tries to get ahead of the cyber risks its own models are accelerating

As OpenAI's governance turmoil and $600B spending disputes threaten its IPO timeline, Anthropic preemptively launches Project Glasswing—offering early access to its Mythos model to detect zero-days before AI-enabled cyberattacks proliferate.

Models4d ago

GPT-5.5: Capabilities and Reactions

OpenAI's GPT-5.5 matches Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.7 on raw intelligence and coding while undercutting it on token pricing, with OpenAI publicly signaling rapid iteration ahead.